Pages

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Guss Hiddink not the best Choice

Way to cause controversy hey? I'm really doubtful about Mr Hiddink being the solution to Chelsea's problems. They seem to be following the slippery slope of Newcastle, a escalator of managers moving every 6 months or so. Ok, so he lead Chelsea to a very impressive 3 points against one of the form teams in Aston Villa, who incidentally I think will hold on to a top 4 position, but Chelsea need stability. And they wont get it with Hiddink, when he hops back on his flight to Zenit.

Or will it? I'm surprised the Russian FA let him go - you do wonder if his real intention is to stay at Chelsea. Certainly I think after 4 months it will be hard to just leave - and I'm sure Mr A will back him with some cash - which I think Chelsea really do need. Their squad is not that of a dominating squad which it really should be with the amount of cash splashed into the squad. Scott Parker, Damien Duff, Wayne Bridge to name a few flops - players bought for over the odds and never played.

I was surprised Hiddink was appointed - I think he will do well this season, but Chelsea wont win the league now, Man Utd will hold on. They need to hurry up, make sure they have a good manager lined up for next season, or it could all go to putty.

Would love to hear your thoughts.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

There's no doubt he raises every single footballer's game, look no further than his achievements with South Korea and Russia to name just two. Chelsea is his biggest opportunity so far as a coach and his success at PSV is a world away from the Premiership so is in untested waters but Chelsea need stability and a boost in confidence - with Hiddink they will have that in abundance.

Anonymous said...

Nice article... and yes, i agree, Hiddink not the best choice.

Ads 468x60px

Shop more chelsea at Bizrate